Apollo.io is a sales intelligence and engagement platform built around a searchable database it describes as 240M contacts and 30M companies. You filter for people, reveal emails and phone numbers with credits, and run multi-channel sequences across email, calls and other steps. Paid plans add a deliverability suite with warmup, domain and mailbox purchasing, a US dialer, call recording and CRM integrations such as Salesforce and HubSpot, all priced per seat with a shared pool of monthly credits.
PineLead works from the other end. Instead of giving you a database to search, it finds new B2B prospects every day, mostly SaaS companies and startups, and you can also add companies by hand or import a CSV. It researches each company live, scores it against criteria you write in plain English, and drafts a personalized first email in your voice. Nothing is sent until you approve it, unless you turn on auto-approve.
The two tools suit different jobs. Apollo fits a sales team that wants a broad data source, automated multi-step sequences, a dialer and many seats. PineLead fits a founder or small team that wants a short, researched list of fitting companies and a well-written first email for each, sent from their own Google mailbox and paid for per company processed rather than per seat. Some teams will want the breadth of Apollo; others will want the focus of PineLead.
PineLead vs Apollo.io at a glance
| Feature | PineLead | Apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | Free start, then $0.01 / credit | Free plan; Basic $49/seat/mo billed annually |
| Pricing model | Pay per AI step; credits never expire | Per seat, with monthly credits that do not roll over |
| Finds new prospects for you | New B2B companies daily, mostly SaaS | You search and filter the database yourself |
| Searchable contact database | — | 240M contacts and 30M companies |
| AI research on each company | Live research per company | AI Research on all plans |
| Qualification against your ICP | Your criteria in plain English, scored with a reason | AI lead scoring on Professional and up |
| Personalized first email | Written per company, in your voice | AI email drafting from contact and account data |
| Review before sending | Approve each email, or auto-approve | Not advertised |
| Multi-step sequences | Follow-up reminders; no automated sequences | Multi-channel: email, call and other steps |
| Sends from | Your own Gmail / Google Workspace mailbox | Gmail on Free; Microsoft and others on paid plans |
| Multiple inboxes / rotation | — | Unlimited Gmail and Microsoft mailboxes on Pro |
| Email warmup | — | Email warmup on Basic and up |
| Replies | Synced into the lead’s thread | Not advertised |
| Bounce & complaint suppression | Automatic on hard bounce and complaint | Bounce and unsubscribe suppression across sequences |
| API | REST email API | API for search, enrichment and sequences |
| Free to start | 100 free credits on signup | Free plan with 900 credits/seat/year; 14-day trial |
Where each one wins
Where PineLead wins
- PineLead finds new companies for you every day, so you start from a ready list instead of building searches and filters yourself.
- Each company is researched live and scored against criteria you write in plain English, with a short reason for fit, review or reject.
- Every first email waits for your approval by default, so nothing goes out that you have not read, unless you choose auto-approve.
- You pay about $0.15 per company taken to a draft, with no per-seat fee, and credits never expire.
- Failed steps are refunded and a company that was already researched is reused at no charge.
Where Apollo.io wins
- Apollo gives you a searchable database of 240M contacts and 30M companies with advanced filters, which PineLead does not offer.
- Apollo runs automated multi-channel sequences with email and call steps, while PineLead has follow-up reminders only.
- Apollo includes a US dialer, call recording and conversation insights for teams that sell by phone.
- Apollo connects Microsoft and other providers on paid plans and supports unlimited Gmail and Microsoft mailboxes on Professional, while PineLead works with Google mailboxes only.
- Apollo offers a deliverability suite with warmup, domain and mailbox purchasing, and inbox placement monitoring.
- Apollo has a free plan with no time limit and deep CRM integrations such as Salesforce and HubSpot.
Choose Apollo.io if your team needs a large contact database to search, phone numbers, automated multi-step sequences and a dialer in one place. It also suits teams on Microsoft mailboxes, teams that want warmup and mailbox purchasing built in, and organizations that already plan around per-seat software and CRM syncing with Salesforce or HubSpot.
Choose PineLead if you would rather not build lists at all. It finds new B2B companies every day, researches and qualifies each one against your own criteria, and writes a first email in your voice that you approve before sending. It fits founders and small teams on Google mailboxes who want a few well-chosen conversations and prefer paying per company over paying per seat.
What it costs
Apollo.io: Free plan; Basic $49, Professional $79 and Organization $119 (min. 3 seats) per seat per month billed annually, or $65, $99 and $149 billed monthly. Credits reset each billing cycle. PineLead: credits at $0.01, about $0.15 to take a company to a draft, 100 free credits on signup, credits never expire. Pricing checked October 2026 — see apollo.io for current plans.
PineLead vs Apollo.io: common questions
Is PineLead a good Apollo.io alternative?
It depends on what you use Apollo for. If you mainly search the database and send sequences at volume, PineLead is not a direct replacement, since it has no contact database and no automated sequences. If you want someone to find fitting companies, research them and draft a careful first email for you to approve, PineLead covers that workflow with less setup.
How does PineLead pricing compare to Apollo.io pricing?
Apollo charges per seat: Basic is $49 and Professional $79 per seat per month billed annually, or $65 and $99 billed monthly, with credits that reset each cycle. PineLead has no seats. Credits cost $0.01, and taking a company through research, qualification and a draft costs about $0.15. Credits never expire and you get 100 free on signup.
Does PineLead have a contact database like Apollo?
No. PineLead does not offer a searchable contact database. It finds new B2B prospects every day, mostly SaaS companies and startups, and you can also add companies by hand or import a CSV. Each company is then researched and qualified against your criteria before any email is drafted.
Can I send multi-step sequences with PineLead?
Not automatically. PineLead focuses on a strong first email and gives you follow-up reminders, but it does not run automated multi-step sequences the way Apollo does. Replies sync into each lead's thread, and leads move from New to Contacted, Replied and Interested so you can see where every conversation stands.
Which mailboxes can I send from?
PineLead sends from your own connected Google mailbox, either Gmail or Google Workspace, with a daily sending limit per account to protect your reputation. Apollo lets free accounts connect Gmail only, while paid plans can connect Microsoft Office or other providers, and its Professional plan supports unlimited Gmail and Microsoft mailboxes.
Try PineLead on your own market.
New B2B prospects every day, qualified against your criteria and written to in your voice. You approve — PineLead sends.
Start free with 100 credits →PineLead vs other tools
PineLead vs Instantly
PineLead vs Instantly compared: unlimited inboxes and volume sending vs AI research, qualification and approved first emails. Pricing, features, who fits.
multichannel outreach platformPineLead vs lemlist
PineLead vs lemlist compared: multichannel sequences and a 650M+ lead database vs AI research, qualification and approved first emails. Pricing and fit.
data enrichment and GTM workflow platformPineLead vs Clay
PineLead vs Clay compared: pricing, enrichment, AI research, qualification and sending. See where Clay's flexible workflows win and where PineLead is simpler.